Genetic risk profiles for depression and anxiety
background Genome-wide significant
findings in genome-wide association studies
(gwas) are generally rare and it has been suggested
that the effects of single gene variants are
even smaller than expected, with odds ratios
maybe lower than 1.2. However, other explanations
are also possible, including the rare genetic
variant hypothesis. Since gwa studies are less
suitable to detect the effects of rare genetic variants,
knowledge about the genetic architecture of
psychiatric disorders is very important.
aim We used genome wide association
data to test whether the assumption of a polygenic
component for depression holds. A second test
involved analysing whether this polygenic component
influences anxiety.
methods The risk profile was based on
the results of a gwas performed in 1738 cases and
1802 controls from the Netherlands Twin Register
(ntr) and the Netherlands Study of Depression
and Anxiety (nesda). snps were selected based on
variable p-value thresholds, from p-value below
0.0001 to p-value 1. Individual genetic risk scores
were evaluated in two samples from the Rotterdam
Study comprising 178 cases and 915 controls
for depression and 216 cases and 135 controls for
anxiety, and from the Erasmus Rucphen Family
(erf) study in which symptoms of anxiety and
depression were assessed in 1886 participants. A
genetic score was calculated for each individual by
multiplying the number of risk alleles per snp
with the log odds ratio, summed over all snps.
Regression analyses were used to investigate
whether these scores predicted depression and
anxiety.
results The genetic scores explained up
to ~1 % of the variance in depression and up to 3.1 %
in anxiety in the target samples.
conclusion These findings suggest
the presence of many loci, each with a very small
effect influencing depression as well as anxiety.
Larger scale genome wide association studies
might be able to detect these effects.